那夜四次

1.3 播放：95萬 更新：2026-04-25

原名: Four Times That Night,Quante volte... quella notte 這個導演十分可惡，先極盡勾引誘惑之能事，逐步升級，把你搞得遐想連翩，簡直都要控制不住了，然后兜頭一盆冷水，一下澆滅了你的熱情如火，讓你不禁質疑起自己的性心理我真的如此丑陋？真的不能把別人當作有人格的人來尊重，而只把他們當成欲望的工具？我的欲望本身難道不是丑陋的嗎？ 他其實在抨擊現代傳媒方式，是媒體把人們變成了這樣我要滿足我要爽，而這并不是生活的真相，真正的美好常常與爽無關。 雖然手法有些惡劣，但其實，他是想要傳達一些信息，幫助你改善自己的生活。 　　

播放通道

詳細簡介

原名: Four Times That Night,Quante volte... quella notte 這個導演十分可惡，先極盡勾引誘惑之能事，逐步升級，把你搞得遐想連翩，簡直都要控制不住了，然后兜頭一盆冷水，一下澆滅了你的熱情如火，讓你不禁質疑起自己的性心理我真的如此丑陋？真的不能把別人當作有人格的人來尊重，而只把他們當成欲望的工具？我的欲望本身難道不是丑陋的嗎？ 他其實在抨擊現代傳媒方式，是媒體把人們變成了這樣我要滿足我要爽，而這并不是生活的真相，真正的美好常常與爽無關。 雖然手法有些惡劣，但其實，他是想要傳達一些信息，幫助你改善自己的生活。 　　

同類推薦

趕山人傳奇

　　該電影以民國民俗懸疑為題材，講述了一個二十年前的悲劇，以及二十年后的探秘之旅。在二十年前，龍二奎（由劉交心扮演）在趕山途中救助山中麻風病院，但一次誤用山中藥材卻引發了一場悲劇。二十年后，龍二奎攜帶徒弟林耀山（由張倬聞扮演）等人再次踏上趕山之路，尋找未知的秘密。

英宮艷史

查爾斯·勞頓,羅伯特·多納特,富蘭克林·迪亞爾,邁爾斯·曼德,勞倫斯·漢雷

 故事開始于十六世紀初，因為皇后凱瑟琳（賓妮·巴尼斯 Binnie Barnes 飾）無法生育，英國國王亨利八世（查爾斯·勞頓 Charles Laughton 飾）同她離婚，另娶了名為恩尼（梅爾·奧勃朗 Merle Oberon 飾）的女子為皇后，哪知道野心勃勃的恩尼整天盤算著推翻丈夫的統治自立為王，當她的陰謀敗露之后，亨利八世親手將她送上了斷頭臺。恩尼死后，亨利八世娶了奇恩（溫迪·巴里 Wendy Barrie 飾）為妻，哪知道在生產時，奇恩因為難產而死，只留下了一個可憐的嬰兒威爾斯（邁爾斯·曼德 Miles Mander 飾）。之后，大臣們想要國王迎娶德國公主，可這一次，國王駁回了大臣們的請求。

神探巴克希

蘇尚特·辛格·拉吉普特,菊池隆則,阿南德·蒂瓦里,Swastika Mukherjee

　　本片講述大學剛畢業的神探巴克希，對抗一個想要破壞地球的邪惡天才的故事。主賓國影片《神探巴克希》由印度著名商業電影導演迪巴卡爾·班納吉指導，融合懸疑、偵探、40年代等元素，塑造了一個印度“夏洛克·福爾摩斯”形象，有著強烈的人格魅力。影片有很強的故事性，動作場面極具想象力，從演員服裝、外景設計、汽車道具都做到了一絲不茍。有張力的懸疑劇情能讓觀眾們在2小時的觀影時間內目不轉睛。

兇兆1976

格利高里·派克,麗·萊米克,大衛·沃納,比莉·懷特勞,哈維·史蒂芬斯,帕特里克·特羅,馬丁·本森,羅伯特·里耶蒂,湯米·杜根,約翰·斯特賴德,安東尼·尼科爾斯,霍利·帕蘭切,羅伊·博伊德,弗蕾達·道伊,希拉·雷諾

 故事發生在1966年6月6日的上午6時，在這樣一個不吉利的時刻，美國大使羅伯特（格利高里·派克 Gregory Peck 飾）領養了一個男孩并取名戴米（哈維·史蒂芬斯 Harvey Stephens 飾）。隨著時間的推移，戴米漸漸長大，一些奇怪事件的接連發生預示著厄運敲響了羅伯特的家門。戴米的保姆莫名自殺后，一個神秘的女人貝洛克（比莉·懷特勞 Billie Whitelaw 飾）毛遂自薦留在了戴米的身邊。之后，神父博南（帕特里克·斯偌頓 Patrick Troughton 飾）找到了羅伯特，他告訴羅伯特，戴米是撒旦的孩子，戴米會不擇手段完成統治世界的野心。對于神父的話，羅伯特半信半疑，直到博南神父的死訊傳來，羅伯特才意識到，事態的發展是多么的糟糕。

等待方舟

耶日·斯圖爾,克里斯提娜·楊達,卡里娜·謝魯斯克,馬里烏什·德莫霍夫斯基,馬雷克·瓦爾切夫斯基,揚·諾維茨基,亨里克·比斯塔,萊昂·涅姆奇克,克茲佐夫·馬扎克,斯坦尼斯瓦夫·伊加爾

　　Set in an underground dungeon inhabited by bundled, ragged human beings, after the nuclear holocaust. The story follows the wanderings of a hero through the situations of survival. People wait for the Ark to arrive and rescue them while their habitat falls apart.　　Delving deep into the dusty and long abandonded vaults of b-cinema in search of lost gems always leaves me with a bittersweet taste. On one hand the discovery of unexpected gems where no one would think them possible is a rewarding experience. On the other hand though it makes one wonder how many of these remarkable low-budget oddities, personal love affairs of directors never quite famous and now all but forgotten, have almost forever slipped from memory?　　n any case what we have here is a little post-apocalyptic gem from Poland that is really better than it has any right to. The dystopian near future of O-BI, O-BA finds a group of survivors of the nuclear war that ravaged the Earth inhabiting an underworld concrete bunker and biding their time as they wait for the mysterious Ark, an air ship of some kind that will come and save them. The Ark proves to be an elaborate hoax, carefully designed to give hope to the malnourished and desperate denizens of the bunker, while in the meantime the dome that separates their miserable existence from the nuclear winter outside is slowly caving in.　　What first striked me about the movie is the design of the bunker and the depiction of the survivors. The survivors are gaunt, filthy and terrible-looking penitents, dressed in rags and aimlessly wandering the neon-lit halls of the bunker like automatons. The bunker is a rundown, seedy place, with bright neon lights peering from all sides like the eyes of malignant beasts.　　On one hand it is a slightly 80's depiction of the dystopian future but the movie never stoops down to MAD MAX cheese. Instead it combines biting political satire with the bleak outlook of a world with no future, black comedy with barbs on apathy, religion and power. The survivors, for example, are fed some kind of flour dropping from a tube that hovers in the air - later on we discover the food supervisor uses books and the Bible itself as filler for this meagre meal. There are many such short symbolic touches, perhaps not life-changing or faith-restoring, yet playful, clever and inspired.　　One thing is for sure; O-BI, O-BA is not your run-of-the-mill sci-fi schlock. It overcomes its modest budget with creativity and has genuine artistic aspirations both from a writing and directing perspective. My opinion is that it should have been filmed in black and white instead of colour though. The director uses atmospheric light and shadow to great effect and it would have registered even better in stark black and white. The blue-green neon on the other hand outstays its welcome after a while. Just a minor gripe in an otherwise solid b-movie with its heart set in all the right places.　　Imagine a less bleak THE ROAD (Cormac McCarthy) being injected with the satire and humour of DR.STRANGELOVE and you're getting there. See it if you can find it.