劇情簡介
Simone暫無內容非常崇拜一位歌手，幾乎到了瘋狂的程度。當歌迷們擁擠爭取簽名把她推倒了，她終于有機會在人群中近距離的看到他。隨著接觸，歌手告訴她自己并不喜歡她，她感到很震驚，她突然陷入一種迷睡得狀態，像是被什么附了身，感覺有一種無法抑制的謀殺沖動，將心愛的人做成一道“晚餐”.....
為你推薦
怪獸與女孩
艾倫·德魯,Robert Paige,保羅·盧卡斯Scot想要從歹徒手中救出妹妹，卻遭人陷害，被控謀殺，被處以死刑。一位瘋狂科學家把Scot的大腦植入大猩猩體內，Scot以大猩猩的身軀復活，開始他的復仇...
時空悍將
丹澤爾·華盛頓,凱莉·林奇,羅素·克勞,威廉·弗西斯,威廉·菲克納故事發生在一個電腦科技極為發達的年代，一名科學家發明了一個殺人程序協助警方辦案，其中集結了數百名連環殺手的資料和他們的作案手法。這個程序是如此的邪惡，最后不僅生成了個人意志，更擁有了人類的外表和可以隨時修復任意損傷的特殊能力，它從禁錮中逃脫了出來，在世間作惡?！ 榱瞬蹲竭@位邪惡的“兇手”，警方設計了一個追蹤儀器，罪犯帕克（丹澤爾·華盛頓 Denzel Washington 飾）被選中成為了儀器的試驗品。帕克曾經亦是一名警察，卻因為動用私刑殺死了讓他家破人亡的殺手而被免除了職務打入大牢。而讓帕克感到在意的是，在殺人程序中，亦有當年殺害他家人的那名殺手的存在。
拍得不錯
方中信,周柏豪 ,張兆輝,蔡卓妍,盧海鵬,林雪,李燦森,應采兒,苗僑偉,宣萱由五個單元故事組成的GOOD TAKE，是香港電影新一代導演的創新作品，包括導演曾國祥《水泥》，講述警員9413（周柏豪）前往報案地點查案，最後只留下電話鈴聲卻不見其人，令人毛骨悚然；導演黃智亨的《囍宴》，一個小孩跟著跟爸爸（張兆輝飾）一起前赴媽媽新婚囍宴的故事，童真與成年人的無奈都盡在心頭；導演黃進的《Good Take》，透過甘草演員泰勒(盧海鵬飾)的生活是向資深電影從業員致敬的故事；導演楊龍澄的《不一定》，以型格對比色彩重構暴力血腥鏡頭；導演黃精甫的《嚇鬼》，Charlene（蔡卓妍飾）挑戰鬼屋一夜遊，遇上中國殭屍、長髮貞子和辮子姑娘，過程又驚又笑！五個故事各自有著不同風格及不同戲味！
異形侵襲
Ian McCulloch,Louise Marleau,Marino Masé所謂的無船員的船攜帶咖啡駛入紐約,但是當警察和一些科學家在船上發現了船員可怕的尸體和大量的盒子裝滿綠色蟲蛋。爆炸的時候蛋溫度升高和任何人誰接觸的物質都會爆炸。現在政府介入和幸存的軍官,一名上校和一名宇航員發現這些蛋可能與災難性的火星任務有關。
蒼蠅之母
約翰·亞當斯,露露·亞當斯,澤爾達·亞當斯,托碧·波塞爾When a young woman faces a deadly diagnosis, she seeks dark magic from a witch in the woods... but every cure has costs.
烏鴉
淺野忠信,瀧內公美,托比·凱貝爾,高岡早紀五〇年代，相館世家長子前往東京追尋屬于自己的藝術攝影。十年打磨，怪才攝影師深瀨昌久在東京重生，愛妻鱷部洋子成為他的繆思女神，癡迷、寂寥、狂亂的靈魂逐步顯影。在快門間追求游戲與私密性的展現，深瀨昌久步步建筑起屬于自己的藝術殿堂。但背后驅動鼓吹他的，卻是一只潛伏在心底暗角、如影隨形的烏鴉，一點一滴滲透他的心靈??
等待方舟
耶日·斯圖爾,克里斯提娜·楊達,卡里娜·謝魯斯克,馬里烏什·德莫霍夫斯基,馬雷克·瓦爾切夫斯基,揚·諾維茨基,亨里克·比斯塔,萊昂·涅姆奇克,克茲佐夫·馬扎克,斯坦尼斯瓦夫·伊加爾Set in an underground dungeon inhabited by bundled, ragged human beings, after the nuclear holocaust. The story follows the wanderings of a hero through the situations of survival. People wait for the Ark to arrive and rescue them while their habitat falls apart. Delving deep into the dusty and long abandonded vaults of b-cinema in search of lost gems always leaves me with a bittersweet taste. On one hand the discovery of unexpected gems where no one would think them possible is a rewarding experience. On the other hand though it makes one wonder how many of these remarkable low-budget oddities, personal love affairs of directors never quite famous and now all but forgotten, have almost forever slipped from memory? n any case what we have here is a little post-apocalyptic gem from Poland that is really better than it has any right to. The dystopian near future of O-BI, O-BA finds a group of survivors of the nuclear war that ravaged the Earth inhabiting an underworld concrete bunker and biding their time as they wait for the mysterious Ark, an air ship of some kind that will come and save them. The Ark proves to be an elaborate hoax, carefully designed to give hope to the malnourished and desperate denizens of the bunker, while in the meantime the dome that separates their miserable existence from the nuclear winter outside is slowly caving in. What first striked me about the movie is the design of the bunker and the depiction of the survivors. The survivors are gaunt, filthy and terrible-looking penitents, dressed in rags and aimlessly wandering the neon-lit halls of the bunker like automatons. The bunker is a rundown, seedy place, with bright neon lights peering from all sides like the eyes of malignant beasts. On one hand it is a slightly 80's depiction of the dystopian future but the movie never stoops down to MAD MAX cheese. Instead it combines biting political satire with the bleak outlook of a world with no future, black comedy with barbs on apathy, religion and power. The survivors, for example, are fed some kind of flour dropping from a tube that hovers in the air - later on we discover the food supervisor uses books and the Bible itself as filler for this meagre meal. There are many such short symbolic touches, perhaps not life-changing or faith-restoring, yet playful, clever and inspired. One thing is for sure; O-BI, O-BA is not your run-of-the-mill sci-fi schlock. It overcomes its modest budget with creativity and has genuine artistic aspirations both from a writing and directing perspective. My opinion is that it should have been filmed in black and white instead of colour though. The director uses atmospheric light and shadow to great effect and it would have registered even better in stark black and white. The blue-green neon on the other hand outstays its welcome after a while. Just a minor gripe in an otherwise solid b-movie with its heart set in all the right places. Imagine a less bleak THE ROAD (Cormac McCarthy) being injected with the satire and humour of DR.STRANGELOVE and you're getting there. See it if you can find it.