即刻觀影
劇情賞析
編輯推薦
養(yǎng)鬼吃人8：地獄世界
蘭斯·亨利克森,凱瑟琳·溫妮克,克里斯托弗·賈科特,卡里·佩頓,亨利·卡維爾,維克多·麥奎爾,道格·布拉德利,Catalina Alexandru這部最新續(xù)集故事從五個(gè)年青的互聯(lián)網(wǎng)游戲者，接到一個(gè)神秘的邀請開始，去參加一個(gè)名叫《地獄互聯(lián)網(wǎng)》站點(diǎn)的特殊聚會(huì)，不過他們沒有想到，那是一個(gè)恐怖的難以用言語表達(dá)的夜晚。。。全新特技、視覺效果，一個(gè)恐怖電影迷不能放過的片子。 這是一部全新而獨(dú)特的Hellraiser系列最新篇，大部分原班人員繼續(xù)上陣。和其它幾集比較來說，表面看只是一出跟其它B級(jí)片沒兩樣，同樣灑狗血的電影，但Rick Bota在血和核突以外，還加上深入一點(diǎn)的人性探討。前幾集的故事主要跟家庭、人的欲望和惡行有關(guān)，結(jié)果令他們慘受地獄使者的騷擾，充滿冷色調(diào)的美術(shù)設(shè)計(jì)，令Clive Barker所營造的世界，更見冷酷。
龍林逃生
陳升衛(wèi),林千雯,鬼哥,龍娜,薛瓊,李信慶《龍林逃生》講述了陳義天、吳勇、梁麗娜、王燕玉等人坐著冒險(xiǎn)之旅客運(yùn)車前去原始森林歷險(xiǎn)旅游，途中車子出現(xiàn)故障遇到紅火蟻、恐龍和被恐龍襲擊的虎哥等人，大家互相關(guān)心、互相幫忙，最終安全地逃出了奇妙的原始森林。
七月返歸
白靈,太保,譚玉瑛,伍詠詩,周祉君,沈殷怡,黃梓樂內(nèi)詳暫無簡介
看不見的客人
馬里奧·卡薩斯,阿娜·瓦格納,何塞·科羅納多,巴巴拉·萊涅,弗蘭塞斯克·奧雷利亞,帕科·圖斯,大衛(wèi)·塞爾瓦斯,伊尼戈·加斯特西,圣·耶拉莫斯,馬內(nèi)爾·杜維索,布蘭卡·馬丁內(nèi)斯,佩雷·布拉索,霍爾迪·布魯內(nèi)特,鮑比·岡薩雷斯,瑪?shù)倌取鯛査?/span>艾德里安（馬里奧·卡薩斯 Mario Casas 飾）經(jīng)營著一間科技公司，事業(yè)蒸蒸日上，家中有美麗賢惠的妻子和活潑可愛的女兒，事業(yè)家庭雙豐收的他是旁人羨慕的對象。然而，野心勃勃的艾德里安并未珍惜眼前來之不易的生活，一直以來，他和一位名叫勞拉（芭芭拉·藍(lán)妮 Bárbara Lennie 飾）的女?dāng)z影師保持著肉體關(guān)系。某日幽會(huì)過后，兩人驅(qū)車離開別墅，卻在路上發(fā)生了車禍，為了掩蓋事件的真相，兩人決定將在車禍中死去的青年丹尼爾聯(lián)同他的車一起沉入湖底。之后，勞拉遇見了一位善良的老人，老人將勞拉壞掉的車?yán)丶抑行蘩恚欢顒诶瓫]有想到的是，這位老人，竟然就是丹尼爾的父親。
煙花1995
山崎裕太,奧菜惠,反田孝幸,蘭迪·黑文斯,小橋賢兒,櫻木研仁,麻木久仁子,光石研,小山勵(lì)基,山崎一,深浦加奈子,田口智朗,石井苗子,酒井敏也,蛭子能收,中島陽子小學(xué)生典道（山崎裕太）與佑價(jià)（反田孝幸）等同伴們就煙花升騰而起時(shí)是扁是圓展開爭論，無果后，眾人困惑起來，為了將困惑解決，他們決定趁夏季花火大會(huì)的機(jī)會(huì)去燃放煙花的燈塔上一探究竟。典道和佑價(jià)同時(shí)暗戀的同學(xué)，早熟的少女奈砂（奧菜惠）因?yàn)楦改鸽x異懷起心事。一場在典道和佑價(jià)之間進(jìn)行的五十米游泳比賽結(jié)束后，奈砂單約勝利者佑價(jià)陪她去看煙花，不想對方最終決定同大伙一起去燈塔。奈砂最終拉上比賽失敗的典道上路，目的地卻變成了火車站甚至更遠(yuǎn)的東京。
等待方舟
耶日·斯圖爾,克里斯提娜·楊達(dá),卡里娜·謝魯斯克,馬里烏什·德莫霍夫斯基,馬雷克·瓦爾切夫斯基,揚(yáng)·諾維茨基,亨里克·比斯塔,萊昂·涅姆奇克,克茲佐夫·馬扎克,斯坦尼斯瓦夫·伊加爾Set in an underground dungeon inhabited by bundled, ragged human beings, after the nuclear holocaust. The story follows the wanderings of a hero through the situations of survival. People wait for the Ark to arrive and rescue them while their habitat falls apart. Delving deep into the dusty and long abandonded vaults of b-cinema in search of lost gems always leaves me with a bittersweet taste. On one hand the discovery of unexpected gems where no one would think them possible is a rewarding experience. On the other hand though it makes one wonder how many of these remarkable low-budget oddities, personal love affairs of directors never quite famous and now all but forgotten, have almost forever slipped from memory? n any case what we have here is a little post-apocalyptic gem from Poland that is really better than it has any right to. The dystopian near future of O-BI, O-BA finds a group of survivors of the nuclear war that ravaged the Earth inhabiting an underworld concrete bunker and biding their time as they wait for the mysterious Ark, an air ship of some kind that will come and save them. The Ark proves to be an elaborate hoax, carefully designed to give hope to the malnourished and desperate denizens of the bunker, while in the meantime the dome that separates their miserable existence from the nuclear winter outside is slowly caving in. What first striked me about the movie is the design of the bunker and the depiction of the survivors. The survivors are gaunt, filthy and terrible-looking penitents, dressed in rags and aimlessly wandering the neon-lit halls of the bunker like automatons. The bunker is a rundown, seedy place, with bright neon lights peering from all sides like the eyes of malignant beasts. On one hand it is a slightly 80's depiction of the dystopian future but the movie never stoops down to MAD MAX cheese. Instead it combines biting political satire with the bleak outlook of a world with no future, black comedy with barbs on apathy, religion and power. The survivors, for example, are fed some kind of flour dropping from a tube that hovers in the air - later on we discover the food supervisor uses books and the Bible itself as filler for this meagre meal. There are many such short symbolic touches, perhaps not life-changing or faith-restoring, yet playful, clever and inspired. One thing is for sure; O-BI, O-BA is not your run-of-the-mill sci-fi schlock. It overcomes its modest budget with creativity and has genuine artistic aspirations both from a writing and directing perspective. My opinion is that it should have been filmed in black and white instead of colour though. The director uses atmospheric light and shadow to great effect and it would have registered even better in stark black and white. The blue-green neon on the other hand outstays its welcome after a while. Just a minor gripe in an otherwise solid b-movie with its heart set in all the right places. Imagine a less bleak THE ROAD (Cormac McCarthy) being injected with the satire and humour of DR.STRANGELOVE and you're getting there. See it if you can find it.