劇情簡介
第1集。比我丈夫更遠 去年夏天，當我的岳父和丈夫離開家時，只剩下我們兩個人。 癡迷于欲望的婆婆帶走尸體的那天， 與她的丈夫不同，沉迷于粗糙的姨媽魅力的已婚婦女開始偏離。 第二集，母親的粗rough魅力 不像她的丈夫艾比·邦尼（Abby Bunny）過著放蕩的生活 用好色的眼睛看著她， 愛上他的妻子。 突然，她變成了一個等待與他發生性關系的女人。
為你推薦
杰姆·耶爾馬茲：招牌笑料2024
杰姆·耶爾馬茲在這部充滿活力的特輯中，土耳其重量級喜劇演員杰姆·耶爾馬茲登上單口喜劇舞臺，調侃了“取消”文化和令人后悔的紋身等話題
誠聘保姆
薩拉·湯普森,馬特·達拉斯,布魯斯·托馬斯,比爾·莫斯利,Monty Bane美麗少女安吉?阿爾布萊特（莎拉?湯普森 Sarah Thompson 飾）獨自到位于偏遠山區小鎮的亞當斯學院求學。這里看似安寧，卻是個地道的危險所在，一段時間內不斷傳出女孩失蹤并被殺害的消息。某天，安吉在學校布告欄看到招聘保姆的通知。為了賺取生活費，她前往通知上所寫的農莊應聘。雇主是年輕的史丹頓夫婦吉姆（布魯斯?托馬斯 Bruce Thomas 飾）和瓦爾莉特（Kristen Dalton 飾），他們即將參加農場舉行的集會，因此招聘保姆照看他們年幼的兒子山姆（凱伊?卡斯特 Kai Caster 飾）。應聘當夜，山姆很早上床睡覺，安吉則獨自一人看書，這一晚似乎平靜輕松。但隨之后來的一系列事件隨即引起安吉的恐慌：默不作聲的騷擾電話、不斷撞擊的房門、沉默冷靜的山姆、經常尾隨安吉的神秘男子。這一切的背后，仿佛隱藏著更為恐怖的秘密……
別開門
徐立,曲少石,楊瓏,劉著,劉金,曹禹澄,李鶴楠,趙洪紀,李昕芮,王昌,熊競宇云南某小鎮上的一家客棧，浪蕩不羈的老板楊浩（曲少石 飾）與女服務員鬧鬧（曹蕾 飾）有染，還想方設法勾搭實習女服務生曉菲（徐立 飾）。柳經理看在眼里，忍氣吞聲。這一天，楊浩的發小蹦燈兒（李鶴楠 飾）海外留學歸來。兩個好朋友一個德行，都有著輕浮虛化的言行。為了給好友接風，楊浩召集柳經理、曉菲、鬧鬧、后廚的仙爺、華子、小胖等人大擺筵席。夜深人靜，安靜的小院內響起了陰冷清脆的高跟鞋聲，接著一個披頭散發的女人影影綽綽出現在各個角落。 心懷鬼胎的個人，將經歷最恐怖的一夜……
正直的候選人2
羅美蘭,金武烈,尹敬浩,徐現宇,樸真珠,尹斗俊羅美蘭、金武烈、尹京浩將繼續合作出演《正直的候選人2》，續集依舊由張幼珍執導。將講述羅美蘭挑戰道知事選-舉引發的故事。他們三位飾演的角色與前作一樣。 計劃下半年開拍。
機器生活
艾狄森·蒂姆林,詹姆斯·達西,史蒂文·斯崔特,德魯·凡·阿克爾,馬克·法姆吉列蒂,里桑·瓦倫丁,埃朗·米歇爾·蒙漢,希拉里·巴拉福德,尼古拉斯·巴迪一對理想主義的年輕夫婦獲得了一個逼真得令人驚嘆的機器人，機器人的幫助使他們無憂無慮，但隨著他們日漸親近，他們對人性的感知將會改變。
童煞驚魂島
丹尼爾·希梅內斯·卡喬,艾邦·摩斯-巴克拉赫,凡妮莎·肖在一個舒適的季節，弗朗西斯科（艾邦·摩斯·貝克許 Ebon Moss-Bachrach 飾）和懷有身孕的妻子貝絲（凡妮莎·肖 Vinessa Shaw 飾）來到墨西哥某個海濱小鎮度假。適值狂歡節期間，小鎮四周歌舞升平，紙醉金迷，多少青年男女流連忘返。弗朗西斯科渴望尋覓一個安寧的所在，他找到當地的漁夫，從對方手中租下一艘船，打算在附近某個僻靜的小島安然度過五六天。次日，他和妻子抵達目的地。那里寂靜無聲，幾乎看不到一個人影。島上的孩子們偶爾逡巡四周，但無一例外臉上都掛著猙獰冷漠的表情。 未過多久，令他們毛骨悚然的事情接連發生。島上的孩子手執兇器獵殺成人，期間更發出令人不寒而栗的笑聲。孩童的殺戮仍在繼續，弗朗西斯科夫婦能否逃離……
等待方舟
耶日·斯圖爾,克里斯提娜·楊達,卡里娜·謝魯斯克,馬里烏什·德莫霍夫斯基,馬雷克·瓦爾切夫斯基,揚·諾維茨基,亨里克·比斯塔,萊昂·涅姆奇克,克茲佐夫·馬扎克,斯坦尼斯瓦夫·伊加爾Set in an underground dungeon inhabited by bundled, ragged human beings, after the nuclear holocaust. The story follows the wanderings of a hero through the situations of survival. People wait for the Ark to arrive and rescue them while their habitat falls apart. Delving deep into the dusty and long abandonded vaults of b-cinema in search of lost gems always leaves me with a bittersweet taste. On one hand the discovery of unexpected gems where no one would think them possible is a rewarding experience. On the other hand though it makes one wonder how many of these remarkable low-budget oddities, personal love affairs of directors never quite famous and now all but forgotten, have almost forever slipped from memory? n any case what we have here is a little post-apocalyptic gem from Poland that is really better than it has any right to. The dystopian near future of O-BI, O-BA finds a group of survivors of the nuclear war that ravaged the Earth inhabiting an underworld concrete bunker and biding their time as they wait for the mysterious Ark, an air ship of some kind that will come and save them. The Ark proves to be an elaborate hoax, carefully designed to give hope to the malnourished and desperate denizens of the bunker, while in the meantime the dome that separates their miserable existence from the nuclear winter outside is slowly caving in. What first striked me about the movie is the design of the bunker and the depiction of the survivors. The survivors are gaunt, filthy and terrible-looking penitents, dressed in rags and aimlessly wandering the neon-lit halls of the bunker like automatons. The bunker is a rundown, seedy place, with bright neon lights peering from all sides like the eyes of malignant beasts. On one hand it is a slightly 80's depiction of the dystopian future but the movie never stoops down to MAD MAX cheese. Instead it combines biting political satire with the bleak outlook of a world with no future, black comedy with barbs on apathy, religion and power. The survivors, for example, are fed some kind of flour dropping from a tube that hovers in the air - later on we discover the food supervisor uses books and the Bible itself as filler for this meagre meal. There are many such short symbolic touches, perhaps not life-changing or faith-restoring, yet playful, clever and inspired. One thing is for sure; O-BI, O-BA is not your run-of-the-mill sci-fi schlock. It overcomes its modest budget with creativity and has genuine artistic aspirations both from a writing and directing perspective. My opinion is that it should have been filmed in black and white instead of colour though. The director uses atmospheric light and shadow to great effect and it would have registered even better in stark black and white. The blue-green neon on the other hand outstays its welcome after a while. Just a minor gripe in an otherwise solid b-movie with its heart set in all the right places. Imagine a less bleak THE ROAD (Cormac McCarthy) being injected with the satire and humour of DR.STRANGELOVE and you're getting there. See it if you can find it.